The education-focused TABA Fall Conference provided H.H.C. Group with meaningful opportunities to examine emerging trends in payment integrity, fiduciary responsibility, surgery center pricing, direct contracting and stop-loss trends. The sessions approached healthcare spending from different angles, but each raised a decision that can influence what a plan pays. Across those discussions, the practical challenge was moving from noticing a questionable cost to deciding what should be paid.
These industry events provide our team with industry insights that enhance the H.H.C. Group portfolio of services combining specialized financial expertise, intelligent technology and strategic provider engagement to help payors examine claims, establish a supportable payment position and pursue resolution with providers.
H.H.C. Group's strongest takeaway from the payment integrity discussion was that coding errors can affect pricing even when technology is involved. A claim may move through an automated process while a question about its codes or charges remains unresolved.
H.H.C. Group sums up the role of technology and expertise this way:
"Technology supports the process. People drive the outcome."
Medical bill review and, where appropriate, DRG validation can identify a supported issue. H.H.C.'s team can then bring that finding to the provider and pursue a resolution before payment, when timing allows.
The fiduciary session addressed court cases that resulted in substantial payouts when obligations were not met. Those obligations depend on a party's role and authority. For people responsible for plan spending, the practical concern is whether they can explain the basis for a payment decision.
H.H.C. Group can provide documented findings and before-and-after results that show what its review uncovered. When a negotiation leads to an agreement, signed terms record what the provider accepted. Those records give plan decision-makers a clearer account of the outcome.
H.H.C. Group highlighted the report from Keith Smith's Oklahoma-based surgery center, built around the true cost of each procedure without an added upcharge. Smith marketed the approach through a website and attracted customers from across the country.
The direct-contracting discussion offered another route. An employer and provider can agree on payment terms, often with a broker or consultant managing the arrangement. For brokers advising self-insured clients, both examples make pricing a decision to examine before care, while there's still an opportunity to choose the terms under which it will be purchased.
Tokio Marine HCC's stop-loss update focused on the financial effect of one severe claim and on setting specific and aggregate deductibles as healthcare prices rise. Those choices determine how risk is shared between the plan and its stop-loss carrier.
The underlying claim amount also deserves attention. When a qualifying high-cost claim warrants intervention before payment, H.H.C. Group's review and provider engagement may reduce claim severity and financial exposure if the findings support an adjustment.
A qualifying claim offers a concrete way to evaluate cost containment. H.H.C. Group can show partners what its review found, the payment position it developed and the outcome of any provider engagement. TPAs, brokers and stop-loss carriers can compare those results with their current approach.
Contact H.H.C. Group today to see how a closer review of your claims can uncover avoidable costs and support more defensible payments.
© 2024 HHC Group. All Rights Reserved.
